Showing posts with label gifted. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gifted. Show all posts

Sunday, March 26, 2017

The Summer of Rage

Child psychologists and teachers refer to the intense learning cycles of extremely precocious and highly motivated children as a phase known as the ‘rage to master’ or ‘rage to learn’. During this time, new, complex skills are attained during an unusually brief and intense learning phase, and at an unusual and accelerated rate.

This ‘rage’ is all-consuming, and usually results in a near perfect and (most importantly) early mastery of difficult mental and physical tasks that seem far beyond the abilities of not only ‘ordinary’ children, but their adult counterparts as well.

‘Rage’ is a good word to describe the single-minded intensity of this phase in children. I should know, because I was one of them.

***

For me, it began during the late summer of 1973. That was the year I finally persuaded my parents to let me take violin lessons. (I had seen the movie, Humoresque, starring John Garfield and Joan Crawford, and had immediately decided that I wanted to play the violin, and learn the title piece.)
They relented, but only if I agreed to some conditions:

1.       I had to stick to it for longer than a few months.
2.       I had to find a teacher they could afford.
3.       I had to find an instrument they could afford.

4.       I had to practice every day.

Because this was many years before the Internet, I had to find the teacher and the fiddle by the only means available in those days, the yellow pages, and free trade newspapers.

For the violin, my parents and I found a place that rented ‘school grade’, instruments by the month for $14.00. Even though that amount does not sound like much money now, it was a sizable monthly investment on my parents’ part back then, because they still had eight others in the family to provide for, including themselves (plus two dogs) and they had no way of knowing whether I would ‘stick to it’ or not.

I eventually found a teacher in a free newspaper (in those pre-Internet days) called The Learning Exchange.

So, with violin rented, and a teacher engaged, the lessons began. My new teacher was imminently patient, and warned me that, as new students go, I was already ‘a bit too old’, (at age 16) to be starting a new instrument, especially one as supremely difficult to master as the violin. When I told him I wanted to be a ‘virtuoso’ and play like the lead character in Humoresque, (John Garfield’s Paul Boray), my new teacher smiled patiently and said, “We’ll see. . .”.(The actual fiddle parts of the soundtrack were laid down by none other than the late Isaac Stern, who, at the time, was my favorite violinist.)

At the time, neither my teacher nor I even knew how far I was willing to go to pursue this near unobtainable goal.

Fortunately for me, I did not have to wait long to play Humoresque by Dvorak. A simplified version of it was available in a beginner’s collection from the old Lyon & Healy Music Store, which used to sit at the corner of Jackson and Wabash in downtown Chicago, only a block away from where I took my lessons.

Lyon & Healy was right across the street from another music store of bygone days, Carl Fischer. I used to frequent each, right after my lessons to browse sheet music, and look at instruments.

Fortunately for me, there was also a Rose Records store a few blocks north of those two stores, down on Wabash and Adams, where I used to also go to browse through albums and cassette tapes. Across the street from Rose Records was a Kroch & Brentano’s bookstore. Between all those establishments, almost right in the middle was a Central Camera store (still there), which I used to window-shop for my photography hobby. For quite a long time, that little two block-by-one-block area was all that I knew of, or cared to see of Chicago’s downtown.

Like the boy in the movie (Robert Blake as the child Paul Boray), I practiced religiously daily after school, and on Saturdays after my violin lessons. And, like that character, I even practiced when my brothers and sisters ran outside to play with their friends.

My parents were not completely caught unawares by my sudden, intense dedication, because they had all seen it before with my artwork, my writing, and my fascination with the space program, AND my fanatical love of books and reading. I also use to keep what I used to call my ‘observation’ notebooks, filled with scientific notes and sketches, mostly of the local flora and fauna, and ‘stuff’ I dissected.

Still, playing the violin, because of the noise it made throughout the house, was a different thing altogether, because now, everyone in the family had an inescapable, front row seat to my growing obsession to learn and master that most difficult of instruments. They could not have avoided that sound if they wanted to. As anyone who has ever heard a beginning violinist attempt the impossible task of scraping music out of catgut and steel, they probably wanted to escape at some point.

Yet they did not have to wait long for my playing to improve. After a few months, I was playing Vivaldi (A Minor Violin Concerto), and simplified versions of orchestral excerpts and famous violin solo pieces, such as Brahms’ Hungarian Dance #5 and Czardas by Monti, typical student fare, albeit for someone with a few more years experience playing than I had at the time.

In fact, I practiced the violin so much, and in so many rooms of the house, the ‘culture’ of the violin somehow infiltrated the family lingo. I once heard my brother say to one of my sisters, who had been continuously calling him to get his attention, “That’s my name! Don’t turn it into a concerto!”

I kept my violin lessons a secret at school because I did not want anyone to know about it (in case I failed or flunked out at it), and because back then, our school had a band, but no orchestra, so it did not matter anyway. Even then, I had the habit of keeping the various aspects of my life strictly compartmentalized, a habit I retain to some degree to this day.

I played, practiced, and took lessons throughout the rest of that summer, and into the winter, the spring, and finally the next summer (1974) between my junior and senior years in high school.

***

Something strange happened when that summer, the summer of 1974 started, and school let out. I did the opposite of what my parents fully expected me to do, once school was out and all the kids of the neighborhood were free to run and play with no cares for almost three months. (Actually, my summers had never been filled with running and playing, more with reading books and comic books, going to the library, drawing, and occasionally visiting with one or two friends of like mind.)

For reasons that escape me now, I suddenly vowed to practice ten hours a day to master the fiddle so I could be a ‘real’ violin player when school started again. All my other summer activities were put aside.

This seemingly innocent, impromptu decision is how the rage began in earnest for me. Once it started, it was so intense, so all consuming, so mentally and intellectually mesmerizing that on my own, I would have never noticed the passage of time, the beginning or ending of the day, the need for food, water, or sleep. If not for my parents, my dog, and my siblings, I would have foregone all bodily needs and functions (all of them), merely to practice all day until my parents were ready to ‘shut down the house’, for the night. Then I grudgingly went to bed, exhausted. The next day, it started all again, for an entire summer.

·         I set upon a strategy and a seemingly impossible task, I would practice ten hours a day all summer, so I could audition for the All-City Orchestra when school started, then play violin in college after graduation later that year (1975).

·         (As previously mentioned, our school had a band, but no orchestra, however, I would still need the band instructor’s permission to audition for All-City Orchestra, which consisted of only the best high school students from top Chicago high schools, the ones that could afford to have an orchestra. The competition was stiff, with students who had played their instruments much longer than I had played mine.)

·         If there were ever a time that my parents realized I was different, this was definitely one of them. (In retrospect, I am certain they already knew, from the compulsive behavior I showed for my other interests, which were growing in number every year.)

·         I arose at 8:00 every morning so I could have two whole hours to get my chores done, and take care of my dog Damon.

·         I started practicing at 10:00AM, and would stop only for short breaks (at my parent’s insistence), meals, and walks for Damon. The daily sessions would last until 10:00PM every night, with no weekends off. (Sometimes I could to get one of my brothers to walk my dog Damon.)

·         During my breaks, I would lie on my bed and read 'The Glory of the Violin' by Joseph Wechsberg, or peruse sheet music of stuff I wanted to play. Sometimes, my best friend would come over and try to get me to come out of the house. He usually gave up after a few minutes, and would leave frustrated, but only after hitting my right arm attempting to knock my bow from the strings. (I also recovered playing with little or no interruption.)

·         I started each session with scales, then etudes. Then I practiced orchestral excerpts, short encore pieces (nothing too difficult, mostly pieces by Kreisler (Liebesleid and Liesbesfreud) and the Beethoven Romances), and the Vivaldi A Minor Violin Concerto, and ‘advanced’ student concertos by Mozart (3, 4, 5), Viotti, Vieuxtemps, the Bach E Major Violin Concerto, and Lalo (the first movement of Symphonie Espagnole).

·         Next I spent at least 3 hours practicing some of the ‘less difficult’ Bach Sonatas and Partitas, followed by more etudes, scales, book reading (to rest my arms and shoulders), and ‘forced’ meals. My dog Damon would come into the room occasionally to visit. Sometimes, he would stay, and sleep at the foot of my music stand, and sometimes he would get bored, and walk away. (I have since found that cats seem to tolerate the harmonics of violin music much better than dogs.)

·         The summer ‘raged’ on until school started. By that time, I had sustained a ten-hour a day practice schedule through rainy days, hot and humid days, holidays and summer barbecues, and family functions, which I skipped one and all. I developed muscle sprain, soreness and tension in my upper back and shoulders, knotted hand muscles, and a dark bruise under my chin and on my clavicle from holding the violin. My fingertips had calluses from playing double-stops, and sliding along the fingerboard hundreds of times a day, and I temporarily developed blurred vision.

However, it all resulted in the desired outcome, because soon after school was back in session, I was easily able to earn a spot in the second violin section of the All-City Orchestra, beating out students from other schools who had started to play their instruments ten or more years before I began my lessons. Because I was from a school without an orchestra, I realized I was representing our entire music department, and I wanted to do well.

***

In end, when I reflect on my so-called ‘summer of rage’, I realize that, as unusual as it may have seemed to some, it was a look forward and a preview of how I, even today, tackle all such big problems and projects, and how that ‘rage to master’, has never left me. It has merely been tempered by the adult need to have a job and other adult obligations (and other interests), and, of course, a social life.

It's possible that the phenomenon occurs with the young in part, because they have none of those obligations (other than a few family chores from which they may even be excused) and can dedicate most if not all their waking hours single-mindedly honing and mastering a skill, or several of them.

***

Once, several years ago when my parents were both alive, I asked them about that summer and what they thought of it at the time. Their response was that, even thought it had been somewhat unusual to them, it had also been actually considered typical for me, and not the first time I had done something like that. (Apparently, and unknown to me at the time, I did it every time I discovered a new skill or hobby, such as with my writing, my artwork, my photography, and my tinkering and building, and the notebook keeping and dissecting.)

They also said that they would have worried had been anybody else (among my siblings) but me.

***

The rage to master and learn never goes away merely because one gets older; it reawakens every time there is a new skill to learn, especially a new hobby, or something so intriguing it switches that rage on to full burn.


The difficult part, for me, is turning it back off again.


Friday, March 24, 2017

Polymaths, Polyglots, and Autodidacts

'Prince' Rogers Nelson
(1958 - 2016)
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
(1756 - 1791)














Polymath (is) a person whose expertise spans a significant number of various subject areas. “Renaissance Man” was first recorded in written English in the early 20th century. It is now used to refer to great thinkers living before, during, or after the Renaissance. Leonardo da Vinci has often been described as the archetype of the Renaissance man; a man of "unquenchable curiosity" and "feverishly inventive imagination." (Excerpt from https://en.Wikipedia.org/Polymath)
Polyglot (is) a person who speaks several languages fluently.
Autodidact (is) a self-taught person.
***
I am the best teacher I know.
I can say this without false pride, ‘humble bragging’, or misplaced humility.
I have taught many subjects successfully, usually to what must be the best student I know.

You also are probably the best teacher you know, for all the same reasons.

The bold statements made above are true about most people, given a simple condition: That pupil and student must be the same person, you (or in my case, me.)

We are the best at teaching ourselves because we know our own strengths and weaknesses, we know what we ‘know’, and what we do not know, and we understand what we do not understand. That makes each of us suitably qualified to teach ourselves almost anything we care to learn, almost.

If you or anyone you know has a hobby or a pastime, one on which a much time has been invested, it is probable that that person taught that hobby to himself or herself, and enjoyed the teaching and the learning process immensely, thus significantly adding to their level of expertise and facility.

Now, I can also state that I am an equally good teacher with others, again, the best that I know. I say this, too, without too much bragging, humble or not, because I know it to be true, and those who I have taught also know it.

However, I cannot say it for you, because only you (or your students) would know whether you are a good teacher of others.

Many are not, especially among those with high IQs.

In fact, though knowledge is the acknowledged ‘coin of the realm’ for sentient species the world over (and at present, we are the only ones we know that all into that category), we are generally and as a group not very efficient at passing on that knowledge to one another. It happens eventually, but not very efficiently, and certainly not without some pain and frustration felt by both the teacher and the (hapless?) student.

There are several possible reasons human beings are generally (but not always) not very efficient as teachers. Some of those reasons are impatience, ego, temper, temperament, lack of empathy, lack of sympathy, and most importantly, little or no understanding of the learning process, often a symptom of the highly intelligent, since high IQ individuals who may not be aware of how they acquired the very knowledge they are attempting to pass on in the first place.

Because of these and other roadblocks, many people fare better with themselves as both teacher and student, even exceptionally bright-to-brilliant ones.

Most people tend to do well when they teach themselves.
Above average people do even better, with an exponentially greater degree of success.
The most prolific among that select number do not stop at teaching himself or herself merely one subject. Their thirst for new skills and new knowledge is not limited to one field of endeavor, so they often gain an equal or greater expertise in many others, some interrelated, and some among several widely differing disciplines.

The greatest minds known to human history, the very greatest geniuses our species has yet produced, have, without equivocation, all been largely if not  completely self-taught.

The ‘why’ of this fact is obvious: Genius cannot be externally absorbed, taught or obtained from an outside source. Genius beyond intellect is only accomplished by an almost arcane, deeply personal internal process, one that begins and ends with both student and pupil self-contained in one entity. It has never been accomplished any other way.

To be sure, ‘external’ teachers such as music instructors may start the process; they may guide the first tentative, early steps on the road to the acquisition of skill and knowledge, but the final level of achievement beyond the ordinary, where most pupils plateau, peak, or drop away, can only be achieved alone. This journey, for some, is, by necessity, a long and lonely one, for others, it can be accomplished as quickly, painlessly, and as naturally as intuition. However, the end of the journey is always the same for those few who can achieve such heights. For a small subset of that august group, being fluently across many languages adds another dimension to both the intellectual achievement, and the level of cultural variety in their experience.

The final product is often a lifetime of brilliant intellectual, artistic, and scientific revelation, not only for the individual, but also for all humanity, however long it takes the rest of the world to recognize that genius.

The most profoundly developed minds of the species are self-taught (autodidact) in several disciplines and fields (polymath). The names of some of these individuals, Such as Da Vinci and Tesla, are well known. Others are not, either because their work has been largely forgotten outside of their fields of endeavor, or because of the highly specialized nature of those fields.

Saturday, March 18, 2017

Please, Don't Call Me That...

“Gifted…”

I hate that word.

Some think ‘hate’ is a strong word that should be avoided, or, at least, used with caution, and they are probably correct. However, as I writer, I have never shied away from the power of words to create or destroy ideas.

And I would really like to destroy the word ‘gifted’, or at least the current meaning it has when used to describe some people.

To my mind, it is self-serving and even a bit pompous. It is discriminatory in its exclusive ‘inclusiveness’, an accolade, if not self-bestowed, then all too readily accepted, one that is beneficial only to the one it is used to describe, and perhaps not even then, if no good use comes of the skills or abilities the label implies.

It also indicates that some of us are, by accident of birth alone, somehow ‘better’ than the rest of us, as if we were preordained or destined to be special. For all we know, ‘how’ we are may only be an accident of birth, and nothing else. I think the following exchange from the movie Troy (2004) best expresses how I feel about being called ‘gifted’.

Briseis: "Why did you choose this life?"
Achilles: "What life?"
Briseis: "To be [a great warrior?]" [gifted?]
Achilles: "I chose nothing. I was born and this is what I am."
***
I have several reasons for feeling this way, all from lessons hard earned, maybe even required.

When I was a child, my parents noticed that teachers would send me home regularly with admonishments and punishments for things that they knew I had not done. (I rarely spoke a word in school during my elementary years, preferring to keep my hands folded on my desk, and kept its as close to the teacher's desk as possible. Moreover, I always turned my assignments on time, usually before time.)

So why was I being so regularly disciplined? It was done to save me from the wrath of the other students, the so-called ‘non-gifted’ ones.

One of my teachers explained:

Having seen a far crueler type of punishment meted out to me on the playground during recess, she had decided that it was better to punish me with the rest of the class rather than single me out for my grades or other accomplishments, thus inadvertently belittling and most likely infuriating the other children. (I wrote my first short story before most of my classmates had even learned to read, I was also already an accomplished artist before most of them mastered writing their names.)

The teachers knew that, growing up around the Cabrini-Green area of Chicago's Near North Side during the hellish 60s must have been a particularly difficult ordeal for a quiet child who displayed such a wide range of ‘peculiar’ interests. This behavior could be especially dangerous in a neighborhood where standing out in such a manner would only result in retaliatory actions from ‘less accomplished’ classmates at the first opportunity.  (Less accomplished does not mean less human, just as being considered ‘gifted’ does not equate with being ‘more’ than human, special, or privileged.)

Unfortunately, for me, it would be several years before the full list of these ‘peculiar skills’ had fully revealed themselves to my teachers, my classmates, my parents, and me. Each newly discovered ability brought along with it another, darker ‘gift’, another reason I dislike the word. That dark gift was animosity, jealousy, miscomprehension and exclusion.

I learned early that being ‘different’ (I’m purposely avoiding using the world ‘gifted’ here), that being different should not be used to single out an individual, or to raise him or her above his or her peers.

Among the young, it antagonizes and provokes.

Among adults, it induces suspicion, envy, and barely concealed animosity, and most of all, intense jealousy bordering on hatred.

Singling someone out as ‘gifted’ does exactly that, singles them out, elevates, and ultimately ostracizes them from the ‘non-gifted’ majority. This type of elevation does not usually sit well with those 'normal' mortals left on the ground, and can make living and working with them difficult.

So I learned to avoid the label, whether it was administered as a compliment or not. I even began to hide certain things about me to avoid being branded with it, a moniker which I grew to regret.

In my opinion, this use of the word, especially in this context, is a perversion of the original concept. A gift of this type serves no one if it serves only one, and serves no one at all if the most important element of the gift is the label itself, and nothing concrete or practical comes of it. A ‘gift’ of this type, that only serves to single out and elevate certain (apparently random) individuals, unless accompanied by considerable accomplishment, is just an empty conceit, and an indulgence of the ego, and little else.

”When you’re smart, people need you. You can use your mind creatively.” Quote from Real Genius (1985)
***
My other problem with the word is way it is it bestowed, and how it is almost ‘greedily’ received, and how vainly displayed. Lifting oneself up as gifted above all others (or ‘some’ others) is also separating oneself from others, until there are no ‘others’ left from which to be separated.

For the label to have any real meaning, the gift should somehow, in some way large, small, or in between, manifest itself to the benefit of not just the recipient, but some other inhabitant of this world other than the one it is supposed to describe.

Only then is the word restored to its true meaning, by elevating a spirit, improving the human condition, or even just one other person in need of inspiration or hope.

I think I’d rather be called a contributor or ‘gifter’ than gifted.

https://evolution-institute.org/contributors/