Monday, April 3, 2017

Epidemic, Pandemic, and Isolationism

(The following comments are observations on the current Ebola outbreak in Africa and the growing calls for American isolationism.)

Try as I might, I will never grow to resent the fact that the world looks to the US to help resolve problems too big for them to handle on their own. That response is emotionally selfish, childish, elitist, racist, and xenophobic in the extreme. Worst of all, it is illogical and ultimately self-destructive on both personal and national levels.

 America is not an independent entity self-sufficient unto itself, but a member of a much bigger community, much more interconnected and INTERDEPENDENT than we like to admit. We also have not attained this position on our own, as our nation a ‘composite’ community based on and built upon immigrant citizens and national economies of the larger community (the rest of the world) around it.

If we let the other members of the worldwide community fall to poverty, disease, famine, and even their own wars of stupidity, we would only be fomenting the seeds of our own eventual destruction. If in all instances, we choose to stand alone, as an island blindly indifferent to the rest of the world, how long before we ourselves fall prey to those same conditions, whether they be war, disease, famine, poverty, or natural disaster?
***
'Altruism' is an interesting choice of words, because it is not merely an idea, or a vague, unattainable ideal, but, instead, a most dire necessity for our survival as species.

Altruism is one of things that have made us the dominant life form on the planet. Altruism and diversity; in our local communities, the world at large, and even within our individual biological makeup, has placed us at the top of the food chain, and made it possible for us to proliferate all over the planet, in all climates, and against a not inconsiderable array of natural and biological attacks.

Altruism and diversity are both successful mechanisms for species survival that have proved themselves repeatedly. (In almost all plagues and epidemics, some survive, while many do not. It is the biological diversity within our species that makes this possible, and ensures our survival.)

However, we are now at a stage in our development (as a highly advanced nation) to either embrace these facts, or denying them and turning our backs on the rest of the world, effectively isolating ourselves from humanity at large. If we were to do that, how long before some agent of nature, whether biological, or catastrophic (as in weather or Earth changes) capitalizes on that self-imposed austerity, and deals us a calamitous blow which we would not be able to recover from on our own?

Would we still expect 'the world' to come to our aid, after we have effectively turned our backs on it?

Altruism is a means of survival for all of us, or none of us, and it is a decision that each of us, nations and individuals alike, are called on to make almost every day, for our own good, or to our own detriment.


One point more: We may be able to hide from an epidemic for a while until our own inactivity allows it to become a pandemic. To whom will we turn, at that time, once the world has succumbed, and the infectious plague has finally crossed our borders? A person who refuses to help neighbors while their houses are burning down all around will soon find that their own house is the only one left to face the inevitable flames, and then, who will be there to offer help and assistance?