Sunday, June 30, 2024

Race and Gender Norms in Popular Fiction Throughout the Ages

 

Penny Dreadful, Penny Blood

It was a long time before reading could become an inexpensive form of entertainment for the masses, before movies, TV, and even affordable theater. However, after it did, it would reach across the long centuries to influence modern entertainment culture, perhaps as no other form of artistic human expression ever has. Pulp fiction tales and their writers would eventually beget radio shows, which subsequently would lead to television fare, and finally the movies of the modern era. The best example of this ‘literary path’ is the Star Trek series, which seemed to emerge whole cloth out of nothingness, but actually developed from pulp writers’ pens to radio dramas (like X Minus One) straight to TV, almost unchanged, and from there to modern cinema. First, humanity had to overcome some considerable obstacles before the common citizenry of any society could easily afford to purchase a book, much less actually read one. Presented in no particular order, societies had to conquer:

  • The gap between the highest and the lowest, from the prince to the uneducated laborer and whoever else desired access to reading materials.

  • They had to reduce their population numbers so that a larger swath of society could afford to make more than a mere subsistence wage, resulting in a degree of disposable cash and leisure time, which would eventually allow for such ‘non-productive’ past-times as reading.

  • They also had to reduce illiteracy across their societies, making an education a universal human right.

  • Finally, they had to create a way to mass-produce reading material cheaply and economically, and, through various stages of industrialization and mechanization, make it possible to provide that reading material at a price low enough for the common reading public to afford.

This entire process was slow in coming, with hundreds of generations living and dying without being able to practice the peculiarly human ability of reading and comprehending the printed word.

Reading the Public

Reading was one of the limited sources of entertainment, education, and information available to the literate individuals, particularly the affluent, prior to the advent of technologically driven forms of entertainment. The type of fare available was usually escapist, religious or scholarly, depending on the person, his or her circumstances, or the overall economic status of the larger portion of the society–the common folk.

As a matter of course, sacred texts played a central role in reading, but only for the chosen few, the literate acolytes, well-educated laypeople (such as business owners), or the ruling elite. Educated common folk were rare indeed, unless their livelihood depended on the ability to read. Even then, not much time or viable literature would have been available for such a non-productive, time-consuming pastime, nor was the technology available to mass-produce enough to fuel reading as a sustainable hobby. That would not occur until after Gutenberg’s printing press in the West, which was well after the Chinese had perfected their printing system.

Eventually, agriculturally based societies would develop the ability to mass produce and store goods and provide it on a level that would allow for a bit more leisurely time at least among the educated, and those activities would include reading, albeit still technologically limited to being small in scale, and very expensive. Usually the material was hand-copied and lavishly illustrated, being of both secular and sacred materials, volumes much too expensive and precious for peasant farmers or indentured servants, but perhaps still available at higher institutions of learning such as early universities, and, of course, monasteries. At one point, and for a long time afterwards, the economies of creating books and reading them were still far beyond the reach of the public.

And yet, the preservation of those society’s cultural (or mythological) histories would indirectly contribute to an environment which would eventually foster reading as an activity that was used for more than just ‘formal’ religious or secular subjects. Reading as a pastime would eventually make its way into the hands of the public at large, no matter what their status.

In the meantime, many ancient cultures developed rich and fantastic mythologies, beliefs and histories as they grew, became powerful, and vanished, especially in the cradles of civilization along the Mediterranean Basin, India, Africa, China, and the islands of Japan, and all across Europe and Asia. Histories begat myths, which became fables, which then morphed into rich sources for fantastic tales and fables for children and adults alike, with each culture’s values and social mores perfectly mirrored, (albeit fantastically) in the tales that they told, passed on, and codified. In this way, a society’s reading fare becomes a microcosm of its cultural identity, which *could* be preserved and resurrected at will, long after those societies are gone or completely absorbed or transformed into something else.

Yet not all cultures had an equivalent of the type of fiction later found in penny dreadfuls or the pulps. For example, the ancient Romans had their poetry and tales of their borrowed gods, while Greeks had their great sagas (like the Trojan War) and their gods. The ancient Chinese had their fairy tales, fables, native philosophies, and several Middle Eastern cultures had their tales of lovers (such as Antar and Abla) their religion-based writings, and stories about djinns and other evil spirits and the mischief they caused. One of the most well known, if not best, examples of this type of literature would be the collection of fantastic stories known as ‘The Thousand & One Nights’.

Illuminated Madness

Of all the (epochs and cultures) in history, perhaps the one that comes closest to having a form a popular fiction similar to the pulps or the penny dreadfuls would be the Medieval Period, which lasted roughly between 700 to 1000 years, depending on who’s asking and who’s answering. Most of the popular fiction during that time was religion-based, or heavily influenced by the fear of religion and its consequences. The era is rife with bizarrely entertaining stories of ghosts, penitence and revenge of the dead, and the doom that could fall upon the living for having wronged the departed, or for committing some slight against the Church, knowingly or unknowingly. Many of these stories were as lurid and sensationalistic as the best penny dreadful and pulp fiction tales. In addition, they were partially available to the segment of the population that could read.

The Victorian Narrative

While these societies worked out their various issues across many generations, their histories, beliefs, legends and politics were already creating a rich backlog of written and oral traditions, materials that would indirectly preserve every aspect of those cultures. This trend would eventually result in the volatile mix of toxic imperialism, sexism, and racism, in the classic pulp fiction era (1882 until perhaps the late 1950s or early 1960s), which, by no coincidence, roughly coincided with both the Victorian Era (1837–1900), and the American Civil War (1861–1865). The genre of classic pulp fiction, although it remained popular beyond the aforementioned historical periods, was shaped and codified during those eras. This form of literature arose during a time of intense racial prejudice, colonialism, and subjugation of peoples of color.

It was born out of the demands of newly industrialized nations that sought cheap commodities and raw materials to fuel their capitalist economies. During these historical periods, any nation or peoples who were not British or American were subject to a myriad of indignities, including slavery and exploitation of non-Europeans, bigotry and misogyny against women, and the merciless subjugation of their own children who were exploited as cheap or free labor. The victims of this system included orphans and children from families with debts they could not repay, such as in the many similarly themed tales of Charles Dickens. These predatory behaviors were all hallmarks of those historical periods, as their societies either struggled with those issues or shamelessly engaged in them.

‘Modern’ pulp fiction was, of course, part of an evolutionary process of the development of popular reading material for entertainment only, as opposed to scholarly or religion-based. One could easily identify penny dreadfuls as one of the very first iterations of what would eventually develop into pulp fiction. ‘Dreadfuls’ were affordable, typically priced at a penny or halfpenny, and produced inexpensively on low-quality, pulpy paper similar to later pulp fiction. The content and style of writing were often sensationalistic and tacky. Similar to tabloid newspapers and pulp fiction, publishers of penny dreadfuls also used sensational artwork and attention-grabbing titles to entice readers with tales of terror, scandal, crime, or infamous personalities. During the time of industrialization, the ability to create and distribute penny dreadfuls in large quantities became possible.

These books quickly gained popularity with a new audience who had extra income and leisure time and were looking for cheap and sensational entertainment that they could easily carry around with them. Another byproduct of the age, capitalism, made it possible for the product to become widespread across the period’s vast English-speaking societies. During the era of penny dreadfuls, the lion’s share of the reading public, similar to later pulp fiction, comprised white native British males who were mostly lower middle-class and had specific spending and reading preferences.

Therefore, these exciting stories were made to suit the interests of this group of mostly men who enjoyed reading them. Adventures were based on the existing social issues of the time, and the then current narrative outlook on a world in which Britannia ruled the waves. ‘The sun never set on the British Empire’, nor its firmly held idea that anyone who wasn’t native British (or white, or male) was seen as a less than human; barbaric heathens in need of religious conversion and outright conquering (or ‘colonizing’) to save their damned non-English souls.

During the times of the slave trade and colonization, racism was rampant in both the United States and the United Kingdom. This led to the exploitation of non-European nations, which created a culture of exclusionary dogma. The sensationalistic stories perpetuated by this culture of dehumanization found its way into penny dreadfuls and other cheap forms of literature. These toxic ideologies eventually led to institutionalized discrimination and bigotry during the classic pulp era.

Other Giants

However, it should be noted that not all literature from this era could be categorized as cheap, sensationalistic, racist, or sexist pulp fiction. Many exceptional authors of the time, though they may have been serialized, never appeared in pulp magazines. Some authors even published their own works, distancing themselves from the less than ideal reputation of the pulps. For example, writers such as Charles Dickens, The Bronte Sisters, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Thomas Hardy, Ambrose Bierce, H. L. Mencken, William Blake, John Keats and Samuel Clemens, who were well-known as Mark Twain, just to name a few. (Still, and not surprisingly, it should be noted that Arthur Conan Doyle was not knighted for creating Sherlock Holmes, but for writing a pamphlet that justified British atrocities during the most ‘Victorian’ conflict of that era, the Boer War.)

Some wrote about women’s issues and their place in the highly stratified society of the Victorians (the Bronte Sisters). Others wrote about extreme poverty, the condition of the poor and debtors prison and children’s issues (most famously by Charles Dickens). Some writers of the era were political commentators, who used sarcasm to criticize the existing norms, such as H. L. Mencken and Ambrose Bierce. Other writers, like Mark Twain, wrote about race, politics, religion, and more ‘forward thinking’ thoughts on those issues. On the other hand, there were also writers of the era who engaged with the then popular topics of the spirit world and religion in their work and personal lives, such as William Blake and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. 

Most of these authors were not pulp writers directly, although one can assume that their works may have appeared as reprints in those pages, with or without their permission. It is worth mentioning that the primary distinction between the serialized pulp fiction of the time and the serialized works of established authors of the era, such as Dickens, was not solely based on content. Although the content was a contributing factor, the difference lay in the material on which the literature was printed (inexpensive pulp), the intended audience, and the sensational, often macabre or paranormal nature of the subject matter that earned it its label and reputation. The era’s fascination with the spirit world, séances, ghosts, and communicating with the departed most definitely would have made its way into the pages of penny dreadfuls because of its sensationalistic nature.

The difference between the fare featured in penny dreadfuls and more respectable literature of the time can easily be summarized by comparing two characters, Spring-Heeled Jack (1837), and Oliver Twist (1838), both which would have been avidly read during the same time period during the Victorian Era. Both were serialized, both were very well received, lurid in the details of the stories they told, and held their respective audiences captive. The former, Spring-Heeled Jack, was a collection of stories about a supernatural character from English folklore that purportedly terrorized London and Scotland during the reign of Queen Victoria. The stories were nothing more than urban myth, cheaply printed on the coarsest (‘pulp’) paper, highly sensationalized, and sold for one penny and often re-sold or re-circulated after the initial purchase, sometimes for as little as half a penny. Spring-heeled Jack can best be described as a ‘leaping, vampire-like Jack-the-Ripper character that would spring out suddenly, sometimes leaping great distances, and catching his victims by surprise.

Oliver Twist, on the other hand, was written by Charles Dickens, who is well known as perhaps the greatest English writers since Shakespeare. Perhaps during Dickens’ lifetime, his portrayal of poverty, debt, and the abuse of child laborers was just as shocking and sensationalistic as any story about Spring-Heeled Jack, if not more so, yet with a ‘nobler’ purpose. Other, more subtle differences disassociated the two types of literature. Charles Dickens’ novels were typically published in 32-page installments by reputable publishing houses and were priced at about one shilling per installment. They were primarily aimed at a different segment of the reading public compared to the penny dreadfuls. However, it should be noted that readers of penny dreadfuls might have also picked up a Dickens story while perusing reading materials.

Penny and halfpenny dreadfuls aimed pretty low for their target audience, and were typically not handled by the respected printing houses, while authors like Dickens and his intellectual contemporaries usually aimed higher. It is that lower end of the literary spectrum that in time would come to reflect and even revel in the worst aspects of the Victorian Era’s imperialist views on the social ills of the day, instead of denouncing them, as Dickens had.

 Victorians Victorious  

               The Victorian Era has been argued as the concluding, turbulent breath of a protracted lineage of European empires, which had endured for almost a millennium, tracing back to the Roman Empire. The reign of Queen Victoria was the last of any real significance, before the empire and its nobles devolved into bickering, well fed, and well cared for tourist attractions. Yet the period was still prosperous, and a time of massive expansion, colonization, and rapacious, capitalist behavior.

The Victorian Era was a period that introduced industrialized global warfare, bringing that deadly human enterprise to new, heretofore unforeseen levels of horrific violence that had been unimaginable mere decades earlier. It gave rise to two world wars and set the stage for a series of violent expansionist policies that would keep disputed parts of the world divided and in a constant state of turmoil and unending poverty and violence to the present day.

                  That period also created for its citizens a mindset and a cultural zeitgeist of privileged elitism. The notion of a divine right and the widespread utilization of military might to exploit the natural resources of other nations fueled the belief in the enduring dominance of the British Empire, its related territories, subservient client states, and the overall Commonwealth. However, the eventual decline of the Empire served as a poignant reminder of the precariousness of such power dynamics. By the time of Victoria’s passing, the age and the empire named for her had already become the doddering, stumbling ‘Dowager Empress’ of the new Industrial powers, including and especially the United States.

                  Yet the culture of the Victorian Era had engulfed the world, at least its most powerful nations. It’s ‘cultural zeitgeist’; the empire’s subconscious notion of its own divine right to occupy a position at the apex of nations, and the willingness to use that position to pillage the rest of the world of its peoples, their labor, their natural and historic resources, their women, and children, all in the name of queen and country. This mentality eventually permeated the culture of the British Empire and even found expression in its artistic creations, including the written word. The “Victorian Zeitgeist” had a significant impact across the Western world, spurring a competition among these powers to quickly conquer, exploit, and profit from the underdeveloped and “undiscovered” nations of the so-called “Third World”.

                  In the process of that race to impose their will on the world, the 19th century saw an unprecedented period of warfare, expansion and colonialism in India, Africa, China, Japan, and all the nations in between, in the name of Western greed, land-grabbing and forced trading, as in Admiral Perry’s invasion of Japan with his infamous ‘black ships’. This land grab was among not only the European cousin-nations but also the U.S. and its foreign interests in Mexico, Cuba, South and Central America. The inhabitants of these nations were frequently regarded as immoral, uncivilized, and requiring “rescue” from their own customs and convictions. They also suffered the loss of their natural resources, workforce, women, and occasionally, their children because of the exploitative practices of the foreign powers. During the Victorian era, many nations that were previously revered as the birthplaces of civilization became targets of wholesale exploitation and sexual violence. They were now classified as “recently revealed countries” that could be capitalized on for their resources.

Of course, this European view of the world seeped into all areas of everyday life, politics, (then) current thought, and the arts, including literature, and perhaps particularly so in hundreds and hundreds of pages of cheap, easily accessible, sensationalistic editions of pulp literature, on both sides of the Atlantic. The Victorian era gained its name because of the pervasive influence of its culture, which persisted even during America’s tumultuous Civil War. Its influence was widespread across Western society, spanning a variety of domains such as fashion, architecture, music, politics, and literature.

'Our American Cousin'

                 America was not an innocent bystander, but a willing participant in the crimes of the era, including colonialism, expansionism, and the manipulation of other nations’ governments and policies to serve its own expansionist ends, as seen in the meddling in Mexico, Cuba, Panama, and the Philippines. Besides the myriad crimes against dark-skinned humanity before, during, and after the Civil War, American policies upheld the Victorian belief of ‘right of destiny’ to use whatever means necessary to extend its territories, wealth, and power. The pervasive influence of nationalistic racism on both sides of the Atlantic permeated popular literature, becoming the very foundation of the “Victorian narrative” an ideal that served as the bedrock of all pulp fiction during that era, and which continues to inspire contemporary works even today.

                  This is where the foundation of pulp fiction was laid, shaped by the stories of daring exploits and adventures often inspired by the real-life experiences of notable 19th-century explorers, including Sir Ernest Shackleton, Richard F. Burton, Admiral Robert Peary, and journalist Henry Morton Stanley, renowned for his expedition into ‘darkest Africa’ to find the missing missionary David Livingstone. However, amidst these tales of rugged masculinity, there is a unique figure in the person of Nellie Bly, a female journalist who bravely ventured into the unknown and broke gender barriers.

 The Ten Commandments of Pulp Fiction

Most fiction of the pulp era falls into a few broad sub-genres and is composed of the same handful of plots, themes, memes, and story lines. These ingredients reflect the political, economical, and empiric views and practices of the day, as well as the general mindset of the populace, as defined by overriding cultural and worldviews of the time. The significance of the ‘Victorian narrative’ in the genre of pulp fiction is such that it has endured to the present day, providing a reliable blueprint for crafting such stories, and to some extent, other forms of fiction as well. The aforementioned narrative has developed into an almost foolproof formula for constructing pulp fiction stories from their fundamental components. Adhering to the guideline of Victorian policies enacted on the world stage during the height of the era, the following summary can accurately describe literally dozens of well-known pulp fiction tales:

  An outsider, typically a white European male, travels to a foreign land inhabited by an exotic, yet childlike and dependent race, which supposedly requires his guidance.

  1. Initially ostracized, the protagonist gradually assimilates into the alien society.

  2. Despite being a newcomer, he swiftly gains proficiency in their language, culture, and even fighting techniques. He gains the trust of their fiercest warrior, triumphs over their worst enemy, and rises to a leadership position, even above the natives.

  3. Sometimes, he manipulates two different factions of the alien race against each other in order to establish his authority and select the winners and losers.

  4. The natives realize they cannot govern themselves or survive without the protagonist, who threatens to leave, take their most attractive female as a prize, or both, since she naturally chooses him as a mate over all other men in the tribe.

  5. The protagonist seduces the aforementioned nubile female, who spurns her own kinsman to follow him. She either accompanies him or helps to elevate him to a position of power over her people.

  6. The once-outcast protagonist, now a leader of the tribe, instructs the natives on the supposed errors of their ways in warfare, religion, customs, politics, and other beliefs, only after mastering those skills better than the locals.

  7. Having fully assimilated into the culture, the ‘hero’ sometimes returns to his homeland, where he views his own people as savage, backward, and corrupted, and sees himself as morally superior. He may long to return to his adopted people.

  8. Occasionally, his evil compatriots follow him back and launch an aggressive attack against his newfound peoples, only suffer defeat at the hands of the protagonist and his newfound allies.

  9. Sometimes the protagonist returns to his own country with great wealth obtained through plundering the locals of all their gold and wealth. He is regarded as a wise eccentric who holds ancient secrets, which he may use to combat crime in his own society, sometimes with a fedora, and sometimes with a mask and stylish tights.

  10. The hero must confront and battle an ‘Eldritch Horror’ so terrifying it is beyond his comprehension, presumably because such Otherworldly Entities are not Victorian/European.                

 Depending on the author or the sub-genre, the narrative can stray a little to suit each tale, but the stories are more or less built on the same few general outlines per each sub-genre. Genres such as science fiction, horror (including Gothic horror), Westerns, “men’s adventure” stories (e.g. boxing), crime/noir, dystopian tales, dark fantasy, alternate realities and societies; all are part of the broader category of pulp fiction. One of the most notable tropes in pulp fiction is the narrative of a foreign hero conquering or usurping the local natives, either by winning them over or destroying them and seizing their artifacts and women.

This trope reflects the Victorian era’s imperialistic mindset. However, some variations of this narrative are rooted in bigotry. Depending on the nationality or race of the alien culture portrayed in the story, the locals may be portrayed as sinister, backward, or animalistic. In such cases, the visiting or invading hero is cast as the savior who violently subdues and conquers the natives, saving them from their own culture and rescuing any white women who may have been abducted. This variation is clear in many Tarzan and Conan stories.

                  Each variation of ‘the narrative’ mentioned above could be an accurate representation of Victorian-era perspectives from both sides of the Atlantic. These views encompassed colonialist and capitalist policies, as well as racist ideologies, which could apply to Western European and American policies throughout the history of European dominance in the world.

The following list comprises renowned authors and their literary works that effectively adhered to one or more of the aforementioned outlines. These stories and authors continue to captivate audiences today through various mediums, such as movies, TV shows, and comic books. Popular examples include the Star Trek franchise, Dances with Wolves, the Indiana Jones movies, various adaptations of Batman, and the notably blatant and infamous Avatar, possibly the most clichéd of the lot. 

  • Edgar Rice Burroughs (Tarzan of the Apes, A Princess of Mars)

  • Robert E. Howard (Conan The Barbarian), 

  • Isaac Asimov (The Foundation Series, I Robot)

  • Ray Bradbury (Fahrenheit 451, The Martian Chronicles)

  • Raymond Chandler (Philip Marlowe novels)

  • Philip K. Dick (Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? We Can Remember It For You Wholesale, a.k.a. Total Recall)

  • Dashiell Hammett (The Maltese Falcon, The Thin Man)

  • L. Ron Hubbard (Battlefield Earth)

  • Harold Lamb (Asian/Middle Eastern Historical Fiction)

  • H. P. Lovecraft (Cthulhu Mythos)

  • Clark Ashton Smith (Strange Tales, Astounding Stories)

  • Jack Vance (Science Fiction, Fantasy, Science Fantasy)

  • Keith Laumer (Science Fiction, including his Bolo Series)

  • Walter B. Gibson (The Shadow)

  • Robert A. Heinlein (Starship Troopers, Stranger In a Strange Land)

  • Fritz Leiber (Fafhrd and the Gray Mouser)

  • Robert W. Chambers (The King In Yellow)


Eulogy of a Ghost Writer               

Just as the fanciful version of New Orleans depicted in these stories does not really exist in the real world, neither does the author, Louis Ellenwood Barlowe. Both are complete fictions. 

                  L. E. B.’s biography is pure fantasy, just as each of his intros to the stories are also part of a fabricated non-reality. While such a person could have existed, he, in actuality, did not, simply because there were no well-known published authors of color of this specific type of heroic/horror fiction during the classic pulp era, which ended in the late 1950s. While there were certainly authors of color of other types of popular fiction, such as gritty crime dramas, stories based on and within the word of the black struggle, there were precious few, if any stories or authors that fit specifically into the genre that would produce a Conan, a Tarzan, or a Princess of Mars. Such flights of fancy were the domain and the privilege of individuals who did not have to suffer of the burdens of discrimination, degradation, or the daily struggle for the simple freedoms that would allow one to divert one’s efforts away from that struggle and towards the world of fantasy. The horrors of day-to-day existence were quite terrifying enough, and so that is what most black authors of the era concentrated on and wrote about.

                  Unsurprisingly, the number of female writers in the pulp fiction industry was considerably low. However, women played a role in other areas of pulp production, women such as editors (e.g., Daisy Bacon and Dorothy McIlwraith) and illustrators (e.g., Gloria Stoll Karn and Margaret Brundage). Simply put, there were few opportunities for women to write their own stories for the pulps, unless they were well connected, or married to a published male pulp fiction writer. It is noteworthy that a few strong female characters were present in the pulp fiction novels, who defied the traditional portrayal of women as weak, devious, or over-sexualized vixens.

These characters include Madame Madcap, created by Johnston McCulley, Carrie Cashin by Theodore Tinsley, Koyala by John Charles Beecham, and Pat Savage, cousin of the more famous Doc Savage. Among the female authors who contributed to the genre, Catherine Lucille Moore, whose was wife of Henry Kuttner, is particularly well known. Another noteworthy author was Mary Elizabeth Counselman, who wrote for Weird Tales magazine, and an honorable mention must go to D. C. Fontana of Star Trek fame, who wrote pulp-style fiction stories for that series, as well as Logan’s Run, and The Fantastic Journey, along with several other well-known movies and TV shows.

                  There did not seem to be much room in the genre for African American authors or women. This does not include the writers of ‘modern’ pulp fiction of the 70s, such as Donald Goines, creator of many hard-edged urban stories centered on urban African American fiction of that decade.

                  It is entirely possible that a writer with a name like ‘Louis Ellenwood Barlowe’ existed, and who was interested in writing African American-based pulp fiction of the action and adventure sub-genre. However, it is likely that such an author would have faced significant barriers to publishing and finding an audience. Despite the potential talent and desire of such a writer or writers, the publishing industry and readership at the time were not readily open to works by African American authors. Persons of color simply may not have had the inclination to spend their time or money on such literature, when their real lives were ‘adventurous’ enough.

It would have been a bold move for any publishing house to release such literature during a time a pervasive racial hierarchy existed that limited the marketability of such content to a broad audience. The barriers for a writer like Louis Ellenwood Barlowe to enter the field and find a publisher and readership would have been formidable indeed. While there were certainly black authors aplenty during this long period, almost none of them would have been making a decent living publishing ‘black’ pulp fiction of this type.

The pulp fiction genre, similar to the movies and TV shows it influenced portrayed non-European characters as villainous, indolent, shiftless, backward, heathenish, or child-like. This stereotypical perception was perpetuated by the same media that inspired it, a reflection of the difficult times that existed. However, how much more colorful, exciting, adventurous, and exotic would the stories have been if they had incorporated perspectives beyond the European one?

Encompassing additional cultures, histories, traditions, myths, and folklore in a more favorable light would have created a diverse and intricate tapestry that could still feature villainy, heroism, and intrigue without relying solely on a European savior and portraying everyone else as evil, childlike, or savage. Regrettably, the arts and literature of any period typically reflect only the perspectives of those creating them, just as history is commonly written by the victors or the dominant class.


Tuesday, December 5, 2023

By Order of the Fiat

What is the difference between money and currency? Most readers (not in the financial sector) would be surprised that there is a difference, and an important one at that. The short video included in the link  at the end of this article gives an engaging and enlightening explanation of the difference between the two, and how the worldwide economy thrives on its modern monetary systems, which not only make local trade possible, but also exchanges on a worldwide scale.
American Civil War 1861 - 1865

The American Civil War can serve as an excellent example of how nations can live or die by the strengths or weaknesses of their monetary systems. It shows the benefits of a fiat-based currency over a commodity-based one, and what happens when commodities fail, and how counterfeiting and ‘bad cash’ can cause rampant inflation and total governmental collapse. (Quick reminder: A commodity-based currency is money backed by a commodity, such as gold, or cotton. Fiat based, on the other hand, draws it worth from and by the decree of a governing body; ‘fiat’ means ‘let’, or, more formally ‘by order of’.)

Side Note: Is bitcoin, then, a fiat currency? That is an excellent question, and one not simply answered. Technically speaking, a fiat currency is backed by a governing body, who sets its worth and value based not on commodities directly, but rather on the supply and demand and movement of those commodities. Bitcoins, on the other hand, are currently not backed by any government, or regulated or issued by any banks – yet. For now, that makes them something else and continually redefined by use and debate.

During that conflict, the North and the South were roughly equally armed and manned, with the same amount and caliber of soldiers, officers, and weaponry. (In fact, many personnel on both sides had attended the same military academy, West Point, and were often members of the same extended families.) So why did one triumph so decisively over the other? In the end, it was not guns, superior generals, soldiers, or firepower, or even the ‘rightness’ or ‘wrongness’ of each side’s cause; it was, finally, money, or the lack of value thereof.
 
Southern Cotton Plantation
Simply put, the North had a robust industrial economy, which backed a strong, fiat-based currency (called ‘greenbacks’), giving it great wealth. (That was during the 1860s, a time when the government of the North was well able to back its currency.)
Union Greenback

The South’s economy, on the other hand, was old, even ‘ancient’, and agriculturally based, depending on brutal manual labor (slavery), and the constant, steady harvesting of cotton and other cash crops, all at the whim of fickle nature and the physical ravages of war. Its commodity-based currency became worthless by an inability to back it reliably, and rampant (Northern) counterfeiting of Confederate bills, which caused inflation, and made the currency worthless.
Counterfeit Confederate Bill

(One reason is that more of the war took place in the South, often on the very land where the South’s cash crop, cotton, was harvested. Those valuable lands, and their grand old estates, were systematically destroyed by war’s end.) In the end, the South was literally starved into submission, reduced to a bartering system, and making it (confederate currency) worthless, and the butt of jokes to this day.
 
Actual Confederate Bill
What eventually happened to the South is described precisely in the video at 8:31, where aliens effectively destroy the Earth by prohibiting the use of money (thereby rendering it useless, exactly like Confederate commodity-based currency.) The modern, worldwide economy is based on a system of roughly interchangeable currencies. Such a wide-ranging economy would be unwieldy, if not downright impossible, with a bartering system. (Whether fiat-based currency is better than commodity-based is may still be considered debatable.)
Northern Industrial Factory

Saturday, July 28, 2018

Darwin, Evolutionary Biology, & Race


Darwin’s ideas about race have (or had) also been twisted or willfully misinterpreted (or only partially quoted) by the Eugenics movement, which ultimately helped informed not only Hitler’s policy of the ‘pure Aryan Race’ and the resultant atrocities of the Holocaust, but also the U.S.’s policy on care and treatment of the mentally ill before and during that period.

Each side of the question of race find what each feels supports their cause in the writings of Darwin. Some paint him as racist, while others say he was not. It is important to note that the human ‘race’ is never mentioned in the ‘On the Origin of Species’ (that would come later in his ‘The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex’) and the language that Darwin often used to discuss race when he did discuss it, was couched in the lingo and beliefs of his time. However, a full study of his work does not seem to support either racism or eugenics, but, rather, the opposite.

Eugenics, a ‘fake science’ for controlling and ‘improving’ the human species through means of targeted selection (as opposed to ‘natural’), was intended to enhance desirable human qualities (based on racist ideas and views) by weeding out undesirable qualities and people from the gene pool. This policy led to the attempted extermination of an entire people in Hitler’s ‘Final Solution’, and, in the U.S. the institutionalizing and sterilization of other types of undesirables, most notably the mentally ill and physically ‘unbeautiful’ or those perceived as grotesque.

Though the beliefs and practices of racism and eugenics would seem to overlap, each was so virulent and widespread in the U.S. that they hardly ever seemed to have influenced each other to any significant degree. Racism was mostly about discrimination, based in part on ideas of racial superiority/inferiority, while eugenics focused almost exclusively on the disabled (mentally and physically) of ALL races.

The Eugenics Movement that would have such a profound and regretful influence on Hitler’s ideas of a ‘Master Race’ (and the policies that followed) actually had its origins in two unlikely sources: the ideas of Sir Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin and a noted scientist in his own right, and widespread practice and funding in the United States. Both white AND black intellectuals supported it at the time, each feeling that its own group was the genetically superior one. Funding came from some of the largest and most well known sources at the time, including the Carnegie and Rockefeller foundations, among others.

What Darwin actually thought and said about the differences in various human ‘races’ can best be summed up in this excerpt from Wikipedia:

“Introducing chapter seven, ("On the Races of Man"), Darwin wrote, "It is not my intention here to describe the several so-called races of men; but to inquire what is the value of the differences between them under a classificatory point of view, and how they have originated."[15] In answering the question of whether the races should rank as varieties of the same species or count as different species, Darwin discussed arguments, which could support the idea that human races were distinct species.[16][17] This included the geographical distribution of mammal groups which was correlated with the distribution of human races,[18] and the finding of Henry Denny that different species of lice affected different races differently.[19] Darwin then presented the stronger evidence that human races are all the same species, noting that when races mixed together, they intercrossed beyond the "usual test of specific distinctness"[20] and that characteristics identifying races were highly variable.[21] He put great weight on the point that races graduate into each other, writing "But the most weighty of all the arguments against treating the races of man as distinct species, is that they graduate into each other, independently in many cases, as far as we can judge, of their having intercrossed",[22] and concluded that the stronger evidence was that they were not different species.[23]


To get a clear view of Darwin’s beliefs call for a complete and (completely unbiased) reading of both his seminal works, ‘On the Origin of the Species’, and ‘The Descent of Man’.

Monday, June 4, 2018

'Dear John': Letters of Revelation



Two schools of thought exist concerning the Bible’s origins:

1.       It is the actual word of God,
issued directly from a Divine source.
2.       It is not.


If one wanted to ride the fence on the subject (and not offend either side), one could say that the source material was passed ‘from above’, and then adapted, translated, and annotated by the willing recipients of the _______church (fill in yours).

For this short piece, however, we will say that the current version of the western Bible (King James being the most well known translation) is the direct descendant of several early councils of the Roman Catholic Church, which decided the final, definitive form Christian biblical canon would take. The Old Testament’s sources were a direct import of the Hebrew Torah, the Five Books of Moses. (The Torah is also referred to by its Greek name, the Pentateuch, which translates into ‘five books’. These books are part of a larger collection of Hebrew canonical text called the Tanakh, or Hebrew Bible. Many of them were sources for the Old Testament.).


Being of an older tradition, and more ancient, Hebrew sources (the previously mentioned Tanakh), with a different persona of God, or ‘Jehovah’, (called the ‘War God by some, or the ‘Lord of Hosts’), the Old Testament depicts a wrathful God presiding over dire times; all fire, dreadful storms, and ‘laying waste’, war and conquering, rape, abduction, duplicity, revenge, and sacrifice. Some of that goes on in the New Testament as well, before and after Jesus, but the overarching message of that later testament is mostly held to be one of peace, at least peace from ‘above’, in the form of Jesus, called the ‘Prince of Peace, (Isaiah 9:6, Old Testament.). In the New Testament, God, through Jesus, becomes a more loving and benevolent (and forgiving) deity.

(Actor Cliff Curtis as Jesus from the movie 'Risen', 2016)
The New Testament’s councils, many and meticulously contested, were hashed out over several hundred years. The first seven, as listed by Wikipedia, are:


These ecumenical councils were to begin the centuries-long process of deciding, in the broadest and most detailed scope, the manner and way the Church would embrace and spread its influence in the world. (The word ‘catholic’, from the Greek, means ‘all-encompassing, embracing, including a wide variety, inclusive: all terms also meant to define to the Church.) However, that ‘all-inclusiveness’ did not include every book that could have gone into the Bible; several source materials were left out, all for reasons political to the Church itself, and the consolidation of its power. (The process has been long; the total number of such councils is twenty-one, spread over a period of roughly seventeen centuries.)

(Note: This short, informal essay is by no means exhaustive or authoritative, rather it is a reflection on, and a simplification of the origins and versions of the Bible, excluding mentions of the versions (and books) of the other offshoots of Catholic Christianity, such as Protestantism, for the sake of brevity.)
(A Parchment from the Dead Sea Scrolls)

These ‘lost books’ of the Bible are referred to by two names, each which gives a brief clue to their original mode of having been written: The Pseudepigraphs or Pseudepigrapha, (‘false writings’) and the Apocrypha, or ‘secret, non-canonical’ writings.

The Pseudepigraphs are what their name implies, works by what were then modern, mostly anonymous writers, but falsely ascribed to earlier (mostly Jewish or Hebrew) patriarchs of the Bible, or ‘written in the style of’ those historic figures. Apocrypha are similarly described, being of ‘unsure or unknown origin’. The two terms (Pseudepigrapha and Apocrypha) are sometimes used interchangeably. Each refers to texts of questionable origin.)
(The Nag Hammadi Parchment Books)

The Apocrypha were books that were included in the Latin Vulgate Bible (and Septuagint), and could have gone into the Catholic Bible as well, but were, for various reasons, left out or rejected by those early Councils. Because these collections of writings were, for all intents, considered somewhat more legitimate than the Pseudepigraphs, they are sometimes included in various versions and copies of the Bible even today, under the separate heading of Apocrypha, usually at the back of the book. Why they were left out say much about the times in which they were written, and the thought processes of the Councils that rejected them, or at least, decided not to use them when compiling the Book. The exclusion also says much about the offshoots of Christianity that would not accept them, as well.

Many of the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha come to us by way of the Dead Sea Scrolls, first discovered by shepherds in Qumran hidden in a cave, right after the end of WWII in 1946 or 1947. That other collection of ancient texts, the Nag Hammadi, is a collection of Gnostic writings by another ancient and mysterious sect of the same name. Some of the Apocrypha have been attributed to this collection as well. (The Nag Hammadi documents were found a year earlier than the Dead Sea Scrolls, near the town of Nag Hammadi in Egypt in 1945.)

The best analogy with today’s literature would be to compare these types of ‘unofficial’ narratives of biblical stories (no matter what their source) to a form of what is now called ‘fan fiction’: stories based on established literary or film sources but written by people other than the original creators. In their texts are stories about Jesus as a back-sassing, murderous adolescent, Jesus in a gay encounter with Lazarus, and also with John the Apostle, and in The Secret Gospel of Mark, a ‘flying wizard battle’ (between Peter and Simon Magus), an infant Noah, inhumanly perfect in birth, shining like an angel and talking, straight out of the womb, and Daniel defeating a dragon.

With so many tales that involve controversial subject matter and the supernatural, its easy to see what the church fathers found it prudent to just leave most of it out. After all, why would anybody come to church for spiritual guidance when they could just 'whip up' some Christian magic, and perform miracles and healing (and absolution) themselves?

So, given the subject matter, and the literary approach, it seems that a text such as The Book of Revelation could also have come from one of these largely forgotten, ignored, suspect, and decidedly sensationalistic sources, yet it still somehow made it into the Bible anyway. It is as if the Councils, tired after 1700 years of debating, decided to throw caution, decorum, and any lingering doubts of losing control over the earthly salvation of its followers to the wind, and ‘rubber-stamped’ The Book of Revelation without editing, censuring, or reading it.

Of course, that was far from the case. Revelation was perhaps the most rigorously debated book to be considered for inclusion into the Bible. It was, at various times, almost universally accepted, and (universally) denounced (and accepted again) before finally settling into its final home at the end of the Book.


This final chapter is odd, for several reasons. It is a series of epistles (letters) written by a one ‘John of Patmos’, to the Seven Churches of Asia, (‘satellite’ worship centers and their Christian populaces, which had gradually spread out from Rome). Scholars were, at one time, were not definitely sure who he was supposed to be, a conflict that was eventually resolved and is no longer a concern. (Patmos is a small Greek island in the Aegean Sea, which during biblical times, was used as a penal colony and point of exile, mostly for bothersome upstarts from various Christian sects, of which there were many.).

His book is full divinely inspired visions, of dire prophecies and grim warnings, with their central theme being the so-called End Times, Judgment Day, and the millennial return of Christ. With nightmarish imagery second only to that found in Dante’s Inferno in Classic literature, Revelation may well be the most brutally descriptive of all the books of either testament. However, what was the true meaning of these passages, and how did they make it into such an auspicious place in the Bible (as the end chapter) when other, relatively tamer books, (and perhaps less controversial), by comparison, did not?

Who Was the Author of the Book of Revelation?

(John, the youngest apostle)

During biblical times, ‘John’ was a rather common name. The author of the book was, at one time or another, suspected of being any one of them; John the Apostle, John the Evangelist, John of Patmos, and even, John, “the disciple whom Jesus loved” (Gospel of John). Eventually, all those candidates turned out to be the same person, the Apostle John, once the youngest of Jesus' disciples, and brother of James Zebedee. This realization was the resolution of the first mystery of the Book of Revelation: the identity of its author. (The question of authorship is no longer considered to be in doubt as it has been in the past, at least not by the majority.)

If John of Patmos was the same ‘John’ as John the Apostle, then that would have made him the youngest of the original twelve apostles, and conceivably able to have survived (into old age) to become John of Patmos. Considering the fact that he’d already been ‘martyred’ by being boiled alive in oil before being banished to Patmos, that survival was not without its challenges. (He somehow emerged from the ordeal completely unharmed, causing an entire Coliseum of spectators to spontaneously convert to Christianity en masse.) John the Apostle then became John of Patmos, and eventually got himself banished to that island for being a trouble-making rabble-rouser of one of the new, troublesome sects that all went under the general heading of ‘Christianity’.

 The most recent research verifies that the ‘Patmos’ John, who is also John the Apostle, is the one generally accepted as the author now.

(John of Patmos)

What, exactly, is the Book of Revelation?

The Book of Revelation takes the form of letters, or ‘epistles’, addressed to the 'Seven Churches of Asia’, and contains some of the most fantastic and allegorical imagery to be found in the Bible. These images come to him in the form of prophetic visions, mostly about the ‘End of Days’, Judgment Day, apocalyptic battles, and the Second Coming of Christ.

(The Seven Churches of Asia Minor, while they initially spread during end of the first century A. D., eventually flourished during the rise of the Byzantine or Eastern Roman Empire. Some time after Christ’s crucifixion, Christianity, at first a minor Jewish cult, spread into Asia Minor from Rome proper, right after it had split itself into two distinct entities known as the Eastern and Western Empires. The division into two halves of the once mighty Roman Empire occurred around the year 284 AD.  under the Emperor Diocletian. That means that John of Patmos would have written his seven letters to each of them during the very earliest years of their histories, between 70 A. D. and 96 A.D.)


Post-biblical writers and researchers all have various opinions on what the allegories mean, ranging from actual future visions of end times, to allegorical representations of political upheavals (and wrong-doings) in the Church at the time John set his (supposed) visions down with quill and scroll. (John of Patmos would have lived around the time of the reign of the Roman Emperor Titus Flavius Caesar Domitianus, (Domitian)at the end of that particular millennium.) It was most likely that emperor that had him banished to Patmos.

Whatever the passages mean, allude to, or predict, they sound more like the apocrypha and pseudepigrahpa that had been purposely left out of the Bible by the various Councils. So how did the last, defining chapter of the Book of books come to be composed of such fantastic material?

To answer that question, it is important to remember that the word ‘Revelation’ itself comes from the Greek word apokalypsis, which means ‘revelation’. So, there is at least one chapter, the final one, which is part of the apocryphal tradition, but one that still made it into the final cut of the Bible. Moreover, it does not hurt that one of the original Apostles of Jesus was supposed to have written it. As such, the Book of Revelation came with sterling credentials, after years of scholarly debate and research had verified its author to be John, the ‘last’ apostle of Jesus.

When and Why Was the Book of Revelation Added to the Bible?
('The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse' by Albrecht Dürer, 1498)

Like many of the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha, The Book of Revelation, (also known as ‘The Book of the Apocalypse’) was not always roundly accepted by all factions of the still ‘factious’ early Catholic/Christian Church. Although it is true that its first reception had been a remarkably good one (as far as potential new candidates for addition to canon go), it later hit a bumpy road, as many doubted its authorship, and its message of a millennial reign of Christ, among other things. (This aspect of Christ’s return, as presented in The Book of Revelation, is considered by some to be a militant, or 'zealot’ form of millennialism, which many early theologians and Church Fathers rejected.) This doubt would eventually spread throughout the various factions of the religion, with many either accepting it or rejecting it along similar lines.

Some churches still rejected Revelation, again, for many of the same reasons it was rejected in the past: Lingering doubts about authorship, the fantastic and bizarre storytelling style (again, much too much like the other rejected texts of the Bible). It was also rejected because of the fact that other less well-accepted factions of the church accepted its prophetic visions, which had too often been called into question by other, majority member-churches of early (Eastern) Christianity. (Also, the very idea of a ‘militant’ Christ, at the head of an avenging army did not sit to well with them either.)


Leading thinkers of the church from Dionysius to Martin Luther and John Calvin (1509-1564) did not have a high opinion of The Book of Revelation. The same doubts about Revelation’s value and meaning still exist, yet it was added to the books of the Bible as it is known today at the Synod (or ‘council) of 397 (during the Third Council of Carthage), by its alternative name, ‘The Book of the Apocalypse of John’.

In addition, to further the confusion, there were other ‘books of Revelation’, most notably, the Apocalypse of Peter, found in the Nag Hammadi Library. Like John’s Revelation, the Apocalypse of Peter had its supporters and detractors, and spent time in and out of the favor of various churches and theologians, before finally receding into the relative obscurity of the other Apocrypha texts.

Yet the question remains: why was such an admittedly contested and ‘odd’ book of John’s Revelation eventually added to the Bible, when so many others like it, the so-called ‘lost and forgotten books’ had been rejected?

The reason is simple: The author of the book, elderly, hoary old John of Patmos, had once been the youngest of Jesus’ disciples, known as John the Apostle. Now elderly but still ‘graced’, the last living follower of Christ, having survived being boiled alive in oil and banished to the island of Patmos by the Emperor Domitian, had received dire, ecstatic visions from a divine source, apparently from Christ himself.

(John the Evangelist)

As a direct link to Jesus, the old sage was well positioned to bring the world a final, apocalyptic message as if it were couched in Christ’s own words, and from his own lips, about his final return. For many of the Church’s early fathers, theologians, and patriarchs, that proof of authorship (eventually) gave The Book of Revelation an unassailable pedigree. (And, unlike so many other rejected texts of the apocrypha and pseudepigrapha, which often offered supernatural ways to 'work around' the authority of the Church, Revelation seemed to offer only the church as a final salvation against eternal damnation and the fires of hell.)

The firmly established fact of author's identity had been more than enough to have The Book of the Apocalypse of John’ accepted as the final chapter of the New Testament, written by the last living disciple of Christ and from Christ's own words, by he who had in turn been called 'John the Apostle', 'John, whom Jesus loved', 'John, the Evangelist', and finally, John of Patmos.